Review of Eliphalet Oram Lyte’s GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION FOR COMMON SCHOOLS [1886].
Lyte, Eliphalet Oram. GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION FOR COMMON SCHOOLS. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1886.
In his preface to GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION FOR COMMON SCHOOLS, Lyte declares that his text is designed for “progressive teachers” (iii). He lists 15 points on how his text will “arrest the attention” of these teachers. Some of these points include (point one the combining) of grammar and composition in one text-book. The clearness and simplicity of definitions (point 3). Point 4, the use of ‘inductive lessons’—“The principle , Use the inductive method to discover the truth, the deductive method to apply it… (iv).” Point 14 explains the use of “ ‘Language Tables,’ and exercises in correcting errors of speech (iv).
In reviewing this text I found that its grammatical examples were quite clear and well organized. This text may serve modern composition teachers as a source of alterative exercises. The text uses an innovative technique for diagramming sentences with different font sizes to emphasize grammatical distinctions. In the composition section there is a useful example for students of how keeping a diary of observances can be used to writing a composition (241). The primary exercise for practicing composition is letter writing. Lyte explains his reasoning in having many letter writing exercises, “prominence is given to letter-writing, as the written composition of most persons is mainly in the form of letters (iii).” In addition to these practical benefits, Lytes text also offers modern readers the historical curiosity of his business writing section. The text discusses the writing of Promissory notes, Due-Bills, Drafts and Checks. The section on business writing makes the reader aware of the importance hand written letters and documents use to have in the everyday dealings. For example, checks as many of the other above documents in the 1880’s apparently were not a printed out form, but rather took the form of short written letters authorizing a specified bank to transfer money from one of its holders to the person the money is owed. Banks apparently relied heavily on matching an individual’s signature, and knowing the individuals involved in the transaction, rather than using account numbers.